Re: DSM: Simple solution


Dawn F. Harkness (dawn@harkness.net)
Tue, 12 Dec 2000 10:42:30 -0500


Big ditto on that one, Mike! I'm not shy about controversy, but I have no
stomach for engaging posts which advocate dismantling the Sudbury model to
reflect some beliefs I do not value. Joe has so much more patience than I
do and I admire his tireless efforts!

Dawn

-----Original Message-----
From: Mike Sadofsky <sadofsky@mediaone.net>
To: discuss-sudbury-model@aramis.sudval.org
<discuss-sudbury-model@aramis.sudval.org>
Date: Tuesday, December 12, 2000 10:31 AM
Subject: Re: DSM: Simple solution

>JJ has presented a pretty thorough response that supports my
>rationale for NOT engaging in this thread.
>Mike
>
>
>Joe Jackson wrote:
>>
>> > Yes, it is belief. If I had done the scientific experiments myself or
had
>> > followed the studies for something like 25 years as Pearce has,
>>
>> Pearce's beliefs are just beliefs, too, Robert.
>>
>> > then I could
>> > say I have experience, not just belief.
>>
>> They would still just be beliefs. They would be beliefs supported by
>> experience, but still just beliefs. When you get so tied to beliefs that
>> you go on a listserve and suggest extravagant adjustments to the Sudbury
>> Model and then rail about the unwillingness of schools to try them while
>> they're trying to explain to you why it would violate the model, that's
when
>> it's time to realize my and your and Pearce's beliefs are just beliefs.
>
>remainder snipped
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Thu Mar 29 2001 - 11:12:19 EST